Below the table, I've set out other possible seed candidates.
The Committee is going to have some decisions to make this year that appear much harder and likely to be more controversial than decisions it's had to make over the last 11 years. They involve highly ranked teams that finished well down in their conference standings:
Mississippi State looks to finish about #19 in the RPI rankings, but finished tied for # 11-12 in the SEC. Their Strength of Schedule rank likely will be #2.
North Carolina State looks to finish about #23 in the RPI rankings, but finished #11 in the ACC.
Wake Forest looks to finish about #26 in the RPI rankings, but finished tied for #9-10 in the ACC. Their Strength of Schedule rank likely will be #1.
The simulation has all three of these teams getting at large selections. In addition, it shows Princeton as the Ivy League champion and Automatic Qualifier. If Penn ties or wins against Princeton next Sunday, then Princeton most likely will occupy an at large position and the eight "6.5" teams will be competing for 3 positions rather than 4.
For practical purposes, it appears that no teams outside the Top 60 are likely to be serious candidates for at large selections.
1 = #1 seed
2 = #2 seed
3 = #3 seed
4 = #4 seed
5 = unseeded Automatic Qualifier
6 = at large selection
6.5 = in pool of essentially equal teams from which remaining at large spots must be filled
7 = Top 60 team not getting an at large selection
8 = Top 60+ team not eligible for at large selection due to record below 0.500
9 = Top 80 team that might compete for an at large selection if in the Top 60
NCAA Seed or Selection | Automatic Qualifier | ARPI Rank for Formation | Team for Formation |
1 | AQ | 1 | Stanford |
1 | AQ | 2 | Baylor |
1 | AQ | 3 | NorthCarolinaU |
1 | 0 | 6 | SouthernCalifornia |
2 | AQ | 4 | Georgetown |
2 | AQ | 5 | TennesseeU |
2 | 0 | 8 | TexasA&M |
2 | 0 | 15 | Vanderbilt |
3 | 0 | 7 | FloridaState |
3 | 0 | 9 | Duke |
3 | 0 | 10 | SantaClara |
3 | 0 | 12 | TexasU |
4 | 0 | 11 | VirginiaU |
4 | 0 | 16 | UCLA |
4 | 0 | 17 | WestVirginiaU |
4 | 0 | 21 | SouthCarolinaU |
5 | AQ | 14 | Memphis |
5 | AQ | 18 | PennState |
5 | AQ | 22 | GeorgeMason |
5 | 0 | 24 | Princeton |
5 | AQ | 28 | NorthTexas |
5 | AQ | 33 | Samford |
5 | AQ | 41 | LongBeachState |
5 | AQ | 44 | CentralArkansas |
5 | AQ | 46 | BYU |
5 | AQ | 47 | TennesseeMartin |
5 | AQ | 55 | Radford |
5 | AQ | 56 | Monmouth |
5 | AQ | 64 | Hofstra |
5 | AQ | 72 | Lipscomb |
5 | AQ | 73 | BallState |
5 | AQ | 77 | Milwaukee |
5 | AQ | 85 | Denver |
5 | AQ | 89 | Colgate |
5 | AQ | 93 | ColoradoCollege |
5 | AQ | 94 | TexasRGV |
5 | AQ | 104 | Albany |
5 | AQ | 105 | CentralConnecticut |
5 | AQ | 110 | TexasState |
5 | AQ | 123 | LoyolaChicago |
5 | AQ | 128 | WeberState |
5 | AQ | 211 | Grambling |
6 | 0 | 13 | SouthFlorida |
6 | 0 | 19 | MississippiState |
6 | 0 | 20 | TCU |
6 | 0 | 23 | NCState |
6 | 0 | 25 | BostonCollege |
6 | 0 | 26 | Auburn |
6 | 0 | 27 | KansasU |
6 | 0 | 29 | Rutgers |
6 | 0 | 30 | ArizonaU |
6 | 0 | 31 | WakeForest |
6 | 0 | 32 | ArkansasU |
6 | 0 | 34 | LSU |
6 | 0 | 35 | WashingtonState |
6 | 0 | 37 | TexasTech |
6 | 0 | 38 | MississippiU |
6 | 0 | 40 | ColoradoU |
6 | 0 | 42 | Butler |
6 | 0 | 45 | VirginiaTech |
6.5 | 0 | 36 | WisconsinU |
6.5 | 0 | 39 | ArizonaState |
6.5 | 0 | 43 | OhioState |
6.5 | 0 | 48 | Providence |
6.5 | 0 | 50 | Louisville |
6.5 | 0 | 51 | IllinoisU |
6.5 | 0 | 53 | NebraskaU |
6.5 | 0 | 54 | Pepperdine |
7 | 0 | 49 | Clemson |
7 | 0 | 52 | NorthwesternU |
7 | 0 | 57 | OklahomaState |
7 | 0 | 58 | OregonU |
7 | 0 | 59 | FloridaAtlantic |
7 | 0 | 60 | StJosephs |
Other possible seeds:
#1: Tennessee
#2: Florida State, Duke, Virginia
#3: Virginia, West Virginia, UCLA
#4: South Florida, Memphis
Princeton is called a likely AQ in the text, but has a 0 next to their position
ReplyDeleteThis is a situation that can come up with the three conferences that don't have conference tournaments. It happens when two teams are atop the conference with equal points in the conference competition. If that happens, my program doesn't identify an automatic qualifier. I could program it to do that, but it would be a pain because I'd have to program each conference's tiebreak system. So, I simply decide myself which team will be the conference champion.
ReplyDeleteIn the case of the Ivy League this year, the simulation has Princeton winning the final game with Penn and the two of them ending tied in points. Since they're tied in points, my computer doesn't identify an AQ for the conference, leaving both teams with a "0" in the Automatic Qualifier column. Since the simulation has Princeton, however, winning in their head-to-head game, I've identified Princeton as that conference's AQ by giving it a "5" in the left hand column.